1992-Costanzo Show: Totò Cuffaro aggredisce Giovanni Falcone....2009 Toto' Cuffaro, dopo una condanna per mafia, va al Comitato Surveillance RAI! Gags
This document is significant because it presents a Totò Cuffaro, 1992 attacks that Falcone. Then in 2008 Totò Cuffaro was convicted of proximity to the Mafia in 5 years (all remember the episode of party-based cannoli) and in 2009 was awarded a place in the RAI ... Watch Committee. Of course this fact disappears. No news from the news. No newspaper, with the exception of the Manifesto, the public.
This is the ultra-asymmetric situation, today, Italy.
network. The power tries to obscure the network with an article of medieval law.
E 'act in a frontal attack on the network by the "power". This attack was carried out by a parliamentary UDC, Giampiero D'Alia, who has tabled an amendment to the Senate (Article 50a) to "filter" the network, requiring the intermediary (read Facebook, Youtube, etc.) the cancellation of the blog or the affected page. If it does not Facebook or Youtube are blocked!
Are there any alternatives? Yes, the simplest is the application of existing laws. DO NOT NEED NEW LAWS freedom. Other
asymmetry that this is censorship. Even in China have come about!
The only constitutional reform that I want ... information. Asymmetry
Digital Culture and Innovation Policy - Ficara
Using the slogan of the site of Michael Ficara Manganelli: "USING THE DIGITAL MUST BECOME LAW FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT FOR ALL CITIZENS LIKE THE RIGHT TO WORK, HEALTH AND FREEDOM 'OF FAITH. "
The information problem is complex, but address them. Today we suffer acausa the RAI-Mediaset television monopoly and control over most media partitocratico. Do not forget that today approximately € 1 billion is taken from the "pockets of Italians" (taxes!) And give them to newspapers. I remember that newspapers and ran as Sole24ore receive over € 20 million a year.
and information, especially the television RAI-Mediaset, is manipulated to hide the facts, for a giant "mass distraction".
What hope? That information comes in the Italian Constitution in a way that the media is recognized an institutional role with all that entails, such as respect for constitutional ethic in telling the facts. On this idea see a start of discussion in Italy and an initial convergence on basic principles.
mortal life and vegetative food / hydration for terminally ill patients is now in the hands of the executive
Eluana The case, which involved millions of Italians was heavily manipulated by the Church and the government's right and his Prime Minister. First, trying to delegitimize the power of the Judiciary, declaring the nullity of the final ruling of the Supreme Court (subversive act in a normal democracy, but that does not appear in Italy), then trying to make a decree to impose the will of the Prime Minister to block ' enforceability of the award, and finally approved by a motion inhuman, violent, unconstitutional, authoritarian. What is this motion? The right conferred on the executive power to prosecute anyone who decides and implements the interruption of nutrition and hydration a person in a coma or terminally ill person but watchful. From today, none of us can have its own life in the terminal phase. Who decides is the Government or the Minister or the Prime Minister. The death, the fact that there is more private, I think, is not subject to individual decision. The State takes care of it is following the principle that the Church says that life is an indispensable good man as in God's hands. It 's the most absurd law that I know.
The "power" politician, he realized that the Internet is growing in a lot of freedom expression and that information is created and diffused. Social networking sites like Facebook, are growing explosively and more people leave the television to read the news through word of mouth, news that bounce from person to person. Here then check the usual "Carneades", called Senator D'ALIA (UDC, so no majority) that prepares and enacts a law article that could lead to the isolation of Italy from the international information, obscuring words, the big international nodes as YouTube and Facebook. The case is similar to China but the Italian law than in authoritarianism, dictatorship and stupidity even the Chinese. In fact, if a national public something disturb the "power", instead of using the Judiciary, the Ministers called for the darkening of the city and if it gets dark the node host! There is obviously unconstitutional because it is not committed to the competent institution but the government intervenes. Only in a dictatorship, follow this procedure. Fortunately, as our President Napolitano said, we still have the Constitution ... "teniamocela close," he said and I believe many Italians share this view.
sure to read the article 50 bis and you will be appalled: it seems that politicians do not know what is Internet, but be careful! show with a law apparently stupid and ignorant, their authoritarianism and the total disregard of the Constitution. In fact, do not attack immediately and directly to the publisher but the intermediary: punish one to educate a hundred! and then would get the only really important result for them, bring these insolent citizens to Big Brother, the only authorized television.
